Transport Topics Online  
The Newspaper of Trucking and Freight Transportation
Welcome  Guest  Log In         
3/20/2017 11:00:00 AM Write a Letter to the Editor Write a letter to the Editor

Uber Says Trade Theft Case Is Between Otto Chief and Google


SAN FRANCISCO — Uber wants an explosive patent infringement lawsuit that could be worth millions sent to binding arbitration rather than open court.

The request, which Uber expects to file within the next two weeks, adds a new twist to what promises to be a high-stakes battle over the future of self-driving car technology.

Waymo, which started as Google's self-driving car unit, filed suit Feb. 23 claiming Uber’s laser sensor tech for self-driving cars is based on data stolen by former Google engineer — and now key Uber executive — Anthony Levandowski.

Uber initially responded that the “baseless” charge was just an attempt to slow a competitor.

Now Uber plans to argue that the matter belongs not in court but in private binding arbitration because that's what Levandowski's original employment contract with Google required. Waymo, the new name of Google's self-driving car project, did not respond to a request for comment.

Uber announced its intention March 16 when both sides met for the first time in a preliminary case management conference in the courtroom of Judge William Haskell Alsup in U.S. District Court in the Northern district of California in San Francisco.

The company's reasoning: The issue of the stolen trademarked information and intellectual property is between Levandowski and his former employer because the alleged theft took place while Levandowski was employed at Alphabet's Google.

Uber still would be involved in the private arbitration but would presumably benefit by not having the case aired in public court.

Arbitration generally is “quicker, cheaper and more efficient, and it’s confidential and private,” said Stephen Hirschfeld, a partner at Hirschfeld Kraemer, a San Francisco-based employment law firm.

Still, it would be unusual for Uber to ask for arbitration because it doesn't really have the standing to do so, as Levandowski’s employment contract was with Google, he said.

2 3 Next >>

By Marco della Cava and Elizabeth Weise
USA Today


Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Follow Transport Topics on Subscribe to get up to the minute news briefs and more from our feeds. RSS Twitter Twitter Facebook Facebook

© 2017, Transport Topics, American Trucking Associations Inc.
Reproduction, redistribution, display or rebroadcast by any means without written permission is prohibited.



Follow Us


This free daily newsletter delivers the latest headlines.

TT Executive Suite
This subscriber-only newsletter program tailors your news.



© American Trucking Associations, Inc., All Rights Reserved Privacy Statement