Biden Administration Asks Court to Allow Vaccine Mandate
[Stay on top of transportation news: Get TTNews in your inbox.]
The Biden administration on Nov. 23 asked a federal court to let it move ahead with a workplace rule that would require employees at larger companies to be vaccinated against COVID-19 or face weekly testing.
The mandate is a centerpiece of the administration’s efforts to contain the spread of COVID-19 as concerns grow that the nation is on the cusp of another winter surge in virus cases and hospitalizations.
Republican state attorneys general, conservative organizations and some businesses argued that the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration lacked the authority to mandate vaccines and were able to persuade a separate federal court to issue a stay of the workplace rule. American Trucking Associations, along with three state trucking associations and a number of groups representing various facets of the supply chain, have sued the Biden administration over the mandate.
In their filing with the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, lawyers for OSHA and the Department of Justice said the mandate was needed to reduce transmission of the virus in workplaces “and the grievous harms the virus inflicts on workers.”
It estimated that the vaccine mandate would prevent the deaths of 6,500 workers and the hospitalizations of 250,000 over six months. The pandemic already has killed more than 750,000 in the U.S. since 2020, and cases have been rising rapidly over the past several weeks.
If it stands, the OSHA rule would take effect Jan. 4 and apply to private companies of 100 employees or more, affecting roughly 84 million workers across the U.S. They would have to be vaccinated or be subject to weekly tests and required to wear masks at work. There are exceptions for employees who work from home, alone or outdoors. Labor Secretary Marty Walsh has said truck drivers traveling alone in their cabs would be exempt from the rule.
A three-judge panel in the New Orleans-based U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals issued a stay putting the mandate on hold. In a unanimous decision, the panel called the mandate “a one-size-fits-all sledgehammer that makes hardly any attempt to account for differences in workplaces (and workers) that have more than a little bearing on workers’ varying degrees of susceptibility to the supposedly ‘grave danger’ the Mandate purports to address.”
OSHA last week said it was suspending implementation and enforcement due to the stay.
The U.S. has a chance to try to reverse the stay because all the challenges to the mandate have been consolidated in another circuit court of appeals — the Cincinnati-based 6th Circuit, which was selected at random Nov. 16.
In their filing Nov. 23, administration lawyers blasted the earlier ruling for accepting the argument that OSHA could not regulate COVID-19 in part because it’s not a hazard specific to places of employment.
“The nature of workplaces is that employees come together in one place for extended periods and interact, thus risking workplace transmission of a highly contagious virus,” they said.
State attorneys general and others who are challenging the mandate have asked that the case be considered by all the judges on the 6th Circuit, rather than a three-judge panel. The court has asked for others joining that request to do so by Nov. 24 and for a response from opponents by Nov. 30.
Want more news? Listen to today's daily briefing below or go here for more info:
